By-laws review: Beware the rusty ratchet effect | Another day in paradise | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
By-laws review: Beware the rusty ratchet effect
sp_BlogLinkWhite Read the original blog post
Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4641
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
14/10/2017 - 11:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Tucked away near the end of the new strata laws that came into force in NSW almost a year ago is a requirement which is being widely ignored but should be a call to action for every apartment resident in Australia.

The 2015 Act requires every strata scheme in NSW to review their by-laws.  What does “review” mean?  It doesn’t say.  What are the penalties for failure to do so?  There are none.

So why is it even there?  Because it’s a good idea, would be one answer.  That said, reviewing your by-laws (or rules, as they are called in Victoria) is one thing, changing them is another matter entirely.

In fact you need to beware of the "rusty ratchet" effect where in can be a struggle to change by-laws but near impossible to undo them once change has been pushed through.

How would that happen?  Easier than you night think.  A motivated minority organises itself and a few proxy votes, keeps discussion to a minimum and might even wrap it's controversial proposal in a whole bundle of  changes that seem innocuous.

By the time anyone realises what has happened, the change is locked in and even if half the people who supported it change their minds, it only takes 25 percent of owners to block its reversal.

But let's look first at how hard it is to get a by-law changed in the first place. The last compulsory by-laws update in NSW was in 1996 where all schemes registered prior to that were given the same basic by-laws.

In Victoria, the law was changed in 2007 so that where schemes didn’t have a specific rule, then the model rule would apply by default.

One common factor in all the Eastern states is that to pass a strata by-law you need a special resolution at a general meeting. And that’s where they all go their different ways.

In NSW you need 75 percent of the voting power of those voting at a general meeting (based on unit entitlements which are based, very roughly, on the value of the units).

In Victoria you also need 75 percent of those voting at the meeting to be in favour.  However, if more than 50 percent of voters but less than 75 per cent agree, it is deemed a provisional approval.  It becomes a by-law unless a petition by 25 percent of owners objecting to it is submitted within 29 days.

And, just to be different, in Queensland a special resolution is passed if at least two-thirds of the votes cast are in favour, provided the number of votes against the motion aren’t more than 25% of the total number of lots.

Finally, the total “contribution schedule lot entitlements” of the votes against the motion must not be more than 25% of the total of those entitlements for the whole scheme.

What are contribution schedule lot entitlements? In Queensland, levies (or fees) have two components, one based on your unit’s share of the running costs of the building while the latter is calculated on your unit’s share of the value of the building.

Regardless of where you live, if your by-laws have been trundling along, oblivious to changes in society, for the past couple of decades, it’s probably time to compare them with the contemporary norms.

But be wary of the rusty ratchet effect.  A motivated minority can take advantage of apathy to push through changes, then effectively block reform when everyone else wakes up to what has happened.

A version of this column appeared in the Australian Financial Review where you can read Flat Chat in the Smart Investor section every weekend.
Avatar
Seek
FlatChatter
Members
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
08/11/2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
16/10/2017 - 6:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Jimmy,

To confirm, the comment made on in NSW 75 percent of the voting power of those voting at a general meeting (based on unit entitlement) refers to 75% of only those voted at general meeting either via presence or proxy form not 75% of the total unit entitlement of strata-titled apartment block?

In the same vain, please clarify the 25% to object provisional approval.

thanks

Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4641
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
16/10/2017 - 7:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yes, in NSW the 75 percent refers to the percentage of votes (by unit entitlement) of those actually voting at a general meeting, whether in person or by legitimate proxy.

Let's say 100 owners from a 200-lot strata scheme attend a meeting and have equal unit entitlements (not likely, I know, but bear with me).

If all 100 vote and 26 of them vote against, the by-law fails.

If 20 abstain and 61 of the remaining 80 vote yes, the by-law passes.

The "provisional" resolution applies only to Victoria and that is when you have a simple majority but not the 75 percent required to pass a special resolution. 

In that case, the objectors have  29 days to gather up 25 percent of ALL OWNERS to petition against the special resolution.  Otherwise it passes and can be registered as a by-law. 

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online:
29 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

kiwipaul: 613

struggler: 459

Austman: 305

Billen Ben: 232

Millie: 213

Cosmo: 170

Kangaroo: 168

considerate band fair: 167

FlatChatFan: 147

daphne diaphanous: 137

Newest Members:

ChrisOldCodger

[email protected]

tonyd

oceancalls

Shazzz

ewright

McCash

Herbie01

Gburraston

Peter M Mills

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 46

Topics: 4398

Posts: 20891

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 241

Members: 5005

Moderators: 4

Admins: 1

Administrators: JimmyT

Moderators: Whale, Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Lady Penelope