How to avoid buying a high-rise lemon | Another day in paradise | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
How to avoid buying a high-rise lemon
sp_BlogLinkWhite Read the original blog post
Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4682
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
06/08/2017 - 7:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
Flat Chat is now appearing in the Australian Financial Review, both in print and online at weekends. This is the first column in its new home.

With recent revelation that the median rent for apartments is now roughly equal with houses in Sydney – and the gap is closing rapidly in Melbourne – many potential investors and residential downsizers are looking at unit blocks in a new light.

No longer the poor relation of the property market, and now a lifestyle choice rather than a financial imperative, the appeal of high-rise living is clearly growing.

But before dipping your toes in the apartment market for the first time, you need to be careful: you may have better consumer protection buying a $1000 TV screen than you have purchasing a brand new $1m apartment.

In most states, the window for claiming against ‘non-major’ defects – those that don’t render it uninhabitable – is only two years.

Major defects can only be claimed in the first six years and in most states, building construction insurance is not required for apartment blocks over three storeys high.

That said, there are some great buildings and good developers around.  All the savvy investor has to do is find them.

So what kind of apartment should you buy? Once upon a time, buying off the plan could be a shrewd investment.  But then the property booms came along and the prices of apartments that hadn’t even been built went through the roof.

We had shape-shifting, where the developers changed the size and configuration of the apartment you thought you’d bought. And sunset clawbacks, where developers deliberately delayed completion of buildings to invoke sunset clauses (a practice now effectively outlawed in NSW).

In both cases they would happily refund your deposit and resell the apartments for much more than the original price.

Buying off the plan is also a gamble because it’s far too easy for dubious developers and builders to shut up shop and ‘phoenix’ into another equally dodgy project .

So  check the directors out through ASIC and then go to the Austlii website to see if their previous companies have been dragged before your state’s Civil Administration Tribunal more often than a good operator should.

OK, how about a brand new completed apartment?  At least you can see it exists. But the clock has already been ticking on defects and do any of the strata newbies on the committee actually know what they’re doing?

For all those reasons, old apartments are often a more reliable choice.  You can see the building’s physical condition and the committee should have ironed any social problems among residents.

A forensic reading of committee minutes by strata search specialists employed by your conveyancer will tell you most of what you need to know about historical problems and solutions.

However, if there’s absolutely nothing untowards in the minutes, you should be very suspicious.  Nothing that involves humans is ever trouble-free.

For the savvy buyer, evidence of a well-run building is worth a lot more than a glossy promise of perfection or the thought that you are the first person to turn on the taps.

Avatar
Millie
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 213
Member Since:
10/10/2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
06/08/2017 - 10:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Too late. Could never, ever, ever have imagined...

It's worth an ABC Series along the lines of Utopia!

Avatar
Puddn
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 73
Member Since:
20/03/2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
08/08/2017 - 3:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I agree with JimmyT - except for " check the directors out through ASIC and then go to the Austlii website to see if their previous companies have been dragged before your state’s Civil Administration Tribunal more often than a good operator should"

In our experience of 7 years chasing defects, we learned that the smart/clever developers/builders don't end up getting named adversely in any court system. Usually because the over-riding company use subsidiary names, and when getting close to losing a case they offer agreements on condition they do not get named!

My advice, is never buy anything off the plan or anything less than 10 years old. Stay away from complex setups such as community associations and certainly don't go near mixed residential and commercial schemes. Also think twice about those fancy 20+storey schemes with massive pumping/plumbing arrangements to water plants hanging off the roof!

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online: Johnk
20 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

kiwipaul: 613

struggler: 459

Austman: 308

Billen Ben: 232

Millie: 213

Cosmo: 170

Kangaroo: 168

considerate band fair: 167

FlatChatFan: 147

daphne diaphanous: 137

Newest Members:

joking

pari20777

Nick-725

Kathleen Arnold

RWallis

brendon8484

jlthompson

Jill Harrison

Radha krishna murthy

Oldmabb

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 46

Topics: 4430

Posts: 21068

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 241

Members: 5046

Moderators: 4

Admins: 1

Administrators: JimmyT

Moderators: Whale, Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Lady Penelope