Strata bullies and how to shut them up | Another day in paradise | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

These posts are now organised with the most recent post at the end. If you have already read the rest of the posts, to skip to the end, use the little bent arrow symbols to take you there. You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Strata bullies and how to shut them up
sp_BlogLinkWhite Read the original blog post
Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4296
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
03/06/2017 - 5:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

How do you stop a loud-mouthed bully from dominating a strata committee? You know the type; they assume their way is the only way and shout and scream like a spoiled child – or sneer sarcastically like a pantomime villain – when anyone suggests an alternative.

Free and energetic discussion is to be encouraged, but all too often the politics of the playground take over with the strongest opinion prevailing over quiet logic while the majority acquiesce to the bullies rather than become the target of their aggression.

Even strata schemes that have a code of conduct for their committees can find that one or two rogue elements will ignore the rules and disrupt proceedings with the sole intention of promoting their opinions to the exclusion of anyone else.

As recent posts on the Flat Chat Forum testify, pity help those on the committee who dare to express an alternative view. Contempt, derision, ganging up, verbal abuse and a threatening demeanour are all commonplace in strata schemes where bullies rule the roost.

And don’t even think of quoting chapter and verse of the law to prove your point – anyone who actually knows and understands the strata Act and Regulations is quickly labelled a ‘bush lawyer’ by those who operate on the loudness of their voice rather than the value of their opinion.

So what can you do to curb the excesses of the callously self-centred, opinionated, brash and bullying?

Despite the comments above, a code of conduct is a very good place to start, as is a set of standing orders as to how your committee meetings should be conducted.

I have posted examples of both a code of conduct and standing orders on the Flat Chat website for anyone who’s interested but I have to say that the lack of examples of either is a hole in the otherwise excellent advice given in the Fair Trading document Strata Living.

So what, in summary, should a code of conduct contain? It should warn against aggressive behaviour, raised voices, personal, racial or sexist abuse and maybe even insist that owners remain seated while they are talking.

It could remind owners that they have legal obligations regarding conflicts of interest, while other technical issues sprinkled through the Act  - such as the use of proxies - could all be brought together in one simple document.

It’s not going to stop anyone from behaving badly; it’s main purpose would be to show where the line is, just so you can tell committee members when they have crossed it.

As for the standing orders, they are more about procedure such as who gets to speak, when and how often and they give the chair a framework for bringing unruly meetings back to some sort of order.

Which brings us back to what you can do about committee renegades who refuse to play by the rules.  You can’t exclude them – they have a legal right to be at the committee meeting, even just as ordinary owners.

And you can’t de-elect them from the committee unless you get a 75 percent vote of owners at a general meeting or, just as difficult, get orders from the Tribunal (NCAT) to have them removed.

However if your standing orders allowed the chair to warn a member about their behaviour and then, if they continued to be disruptive,  ‘name’ them, leading to an immediate vote by the committee that they had acted in breach of your code of conduct, that could go on the minutes of the meeting for everyone else to see.

That could appear as “Mr Knowitall from lot 276 was warned and the committee agreed he had breached clause five of the Code of Conduct relating to excessively aggressive and abusive behaviour [or whatever].”

By the way, if anyone is worried about potential defamation in criticising someone in the minutes, the law allows a certain level of qualified privilege for comments that are made as part of the management of corporations and the like, provided they are not done maliciously.

Now, a normal human being would soon realise that continuing this behaviour was counter-productive and pull their head in.

If they didn’t, and they were ‘named’ a number of times, you would have plenty of ammunition to take to your AGM to make sure they weren’t re-elected.

There is more on this on the Flat Chat Forum.

Avatar
Sir Humphrey
Canberra
StrataGuru
Members

Full Members

Moderators
Forum Posts: 866
Member Since:
19/04/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
04/06/2017 - 10:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

JimmyT said
How do you stop a loud-mouthed bully from dominating a strata committee? You know the type; they assume their way is the only way and shout and scream like a spoiled child – or sneer sarcastically like a pantomime villain – when anyone suggests an alternative.

Free and energetic discussion is to be encouraged, but all too often the politics of the playground take over with the strongest opinion prevailing over quiet logic while the majority acquiesce to the bullies rather than become the target of their aggression...

Indeed. Even this 'strata guru' has decided to call it a day and resigned from his committee. The bully was bad enough but the acquiescence of some of the others on the EC was really the last straw. Some just kept their heads down or tried to keep the peace while others scored points by siding with the bully. Not knowing whether you had support or not and every little issue getting bigger than Ben Hur is what wore me down. So I am having a break from our committee for a bit. Most of what I wanted to see done has been done now and I might be able to do more from outside the tent for a while. 

I expect the new guy will manage to alienate a fair few owners soon enough and I will be able to console myself with a little schadenfreude. 

Avatar
azennaro
Newbie
Members
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
22/05/2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
12/06/2017 - 4:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi I tried to raise a dispute with the commissioner qld regarding a breach of code of conduct from a commiittee member with several attached examples of the emails by the chairman to the committee bully .only to be told sorry you have to get 25 % of the building behind you to ask to have her removed.
Why can the matter not be held as a conciliated matter at least they would have to be held accountable to attend and have the cide of conduct enforced bt penalry point's x amount and hour off the committee. It's useless having a code of conduct if the commissioner won't except the matter.Enforce the code and less people would breach it just because they are the committee bully

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online: stratus
19 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

kiwipaul: 613

struggler: 459

Austman: 258

Billen Ben: 232

Millie: 192

Kangaroo: 167

considerate band fair: 167

Cosmo: 163

FlatChatFan: 147

daphne diaphanous: 137

Newest Members:

stratus

nixjet

Country Bumpkin

danthan

Larry

ggf

linnyj

Dana Traurig

zsmann

VPS

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 46

Topics: 4116

Posts: 19274

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 241

Members: 4729

Moderators: 4

Admins: 1

Administrators: JimmyT

Moderators: Whale, Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Lady Penelope