DIRECT ACTION | Common Property | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

These posts are now organised with the most recent post at the end. If you have already read the rest of the posts, to skip to the end, use the little bent arrow symbols to take you there. You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics.

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
DIRECT ACTION
dech
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
29/05/2012 - 4:59 pm
Member Since: 15/08/2011
Forum Posts: 61
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

   Our OC has recently replaced a section of fence which was in excellent condition and two attached clotheslines have been refitted at a decreased height which makes them very difficult to use if you are over about 165cms tall (which makes me the only person likely to be affected).  A polite e-mail has attracted the expected non- response from the EC.  Neither the new fence nor the original fitment of the clotheslines was approved by Special Resolution.   I am seriously considering attempting to alter one at minimal expense which would probably result in a somewhat rough looking outcome i.e. bent over nails holding the top of the structure to the fence. My guess is that if when an EC member notices a tradesman would be summoned to return it to the previous location and to be true to the original intent I would have to repeat the alteration.  Personally paying a tradesman to alter it may be wiser but with my share of the OC funds at about $4000 it would leave a bad taste and the EC may well shift it again (yes spite could well be their chief consideration).  This is a "final straw" scenario and I wonder what the downsides could be.   

PeterC
Canberra
StrataGuru
Members

Full Members
30/05/2012 - 7:59 am
Member Since: 19/04/2011
Forum Posts: 478
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I assume these are clotheslines on common property for general use? If so, and the EC won't respond to your suggestion put in writing, I suggest 1) talk directly to someone on the EC in person, face to face. Perhaps they are are snowed under with other things? Offer to organise a tradesperson to move one to be higher. Point out the long term benefit of having them at different heights so that one better suits tall people and the other better suits short people. 2) If that gets you nowhere put it to the next general meeting. A decision of a general meeting overrides the decisions of the EC and they have to act on the GM decisions.

dech
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
27/06/2012 - 2:51 pm
Member Since: 15/08/2011
Forum Posts: 61
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

PeterC said
... I suggest 1) talk directly to someone on the EC in person, face to face. ... ..2)..  put it to the next general meeting. 

The fact alone that I am making the request rules out any prospect of action on the part of the EC and they have near total control of GM's via proxies.  My real question is what if any legal difficulty could I get into for altering common property  - which has never been considered or approved at a properly convened meeting of the O.C?  Is there any difference between a clothesline frame lower than the height of the average man and a broken bottle on the same path i.e. both are "owned" by the OC but neither have been approved?

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online: Dukes
25 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

kiwipaul: 613

scotlandx: 525

PeterC: 478

struggler: 454

Billen Ben: 233

Austman: 225

considerate band fair: 167

Kangaroo: 167

FlatChatFan: 147

daphne diaphanous: 137

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 239

Members: 3096

Moderators: 1

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 44

Topics: 3075

Posts: 14830

Newest Members: Tim Morrison, rhea, Merton Kidd, noshirts, Glider, Doug Bembrick, mbenson, Matanuska, catsunit, posy.mcgrane@bakermckenzie.com

Moderators: Whale: 1443

Administrators: JimmyT: 3130