Walls affected by water seepage | Common Property | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Walls affected by water seepage
Avatar
HappyNow
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
08/05/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
07/02/2017 - 8:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

At an EGM to be held next week - Item 4:  That a special levy contribution be raised to the Admin Fund totalling $110000 in 12 instalments commencing 1/4/17 and ending 1/1/2020 (3 years). 

This is a SEPP5 complex in Sydney.  ALL 21 apartment owners will be asked to contribute however only 8 of the apartments are being repaired.  The repairs though do not include removing the balcony tiles to stop the leakage over the balcony fronts so the problem will be ongoing and does not include ALL the many walls that are affected.  That will not be tackled until after 2020!  By then, the apartments in the front will sell and move on, giving notice to purchasers that a special levy will be required to be raised (again).

Also there are 3 quotes.  Two are over $270000, and one at $171000.  That in itself makes you ask questions as to the reason for such discrepancy.  Also the sinking fund currently has $145000.

This cannot be claimed on the Builders insurance now as it has passed the allowed time period.  By way of explanation, The Chairman at the time decided 3 years ago to spend $15000 repainting the water damaged bubble affected walls which have re-bubbled now.  The Committee outvoted those who did not want it carried out that way but wanted to claim against the builders insurance. 

Now the elderly owners are forced to pay the special levy but the repairs being carried out do not improve everyone's apartments, just a chosen few facing the street frontage.. 

What do others think?  Is this the normal way of doing things?

Avatar
Lady Penelope
StrataGuru
Members

Full Members
Forum Posts: 383
Member Since:
13/02/2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
07/02/2017 - 8:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

If the walls are common property walls then it is immaterial whether the repairs directly benefit all Lot owners or not. The Owners Corporation (i.e. the Lot owners) own the common property so all Lot owners benefit from the repairs, albeit indirectly.

An Owners Corporation has a statutory obligation to maintain and repair common property.

Avatar
HappyNow
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
08/05/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
07/02/2017 - 9:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yes understand however shouldn't ALL the common property be fixed, not just the walls of the favoured few?

Avatar
Lady Penelope
StrataGuru
Members

Full Members
Forum Posts: 383
Member Since:
13/02/2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
07/02/2017 - 10:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

HappyNow - Without knowing all the details perhaps the repairs were prioritised according to the most urgent need.

If you want all the repairs undertaken at once then why don't you raise a Motion at the next General Meeting? The special levies will be higher if all repairs are undertaken at once which may cause some anxiety - however, as an option, your Owners Corporation may be able to use a Strata Loan. See the details re Strata Loan from Lannock Strata Finance at the bottom of this page.

Avatar
Stevecro
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 51
Member Since:
26/08/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
08/02/2017 - 9:49 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

HappyNow, owners corporations have the ability to prioritise repairs to common property. Even though the Act does not stipulate this, it comes down to common sense. If a building has many large costly repairs, if they were all to be actioned at once, the increase in levies for owners would be astronomical.

I have seen orders made by the NCAT in similar situations where the OC made decisions to repair one part of a building over another, and not action all common property repairs at the one time. The NCAT upheld the OC's decision to do this due to the reasons I mentioned above. As proudsceptic mentioned, we don't all the details of your matter, you could try mediate with the OC as a first step.

Avatar
Sir Humphrey
Canberra
StrataGuru
Members

Full Members

Moderators
Forum Posts: 891
Member Since:
19/04/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
08/02/2017 - 5:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Do I understand correctly that this is the outside wall facing the street being repaired first? If so, it does not sound unreasonable to repair the most visible face of the building as the first priority. That benefits all owners I would have thought. Even if your unit is on the other side, it makes a better initial impression to visitors or potential buyers. 

In due course all should be repaired. Perhaps the plan is to see how doing this face goes then move on to the next section and so on. Thereby the cost is spread over some years. 

Avatar
HappyNow
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
08/05/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
14/02/2017 - 9:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks everyone.  Meeting held last night.  They are going to do a destruction test of one of the front balconies and then monitor it for 6 months.  It may mean taking off the render then painting directly on the bricks (or whatever is under the render).  I suggested using textured paint which will give the front a clean look and save $100K in the interim

Avatar
Tess McGill
Sydney
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 27
Member Since:
22/10/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
14/02/2017 - 1:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Not wishing to throw petrol on the fire, might there be an action against the former Committee members who cruelled your opportunity to claim against the builder's warranty? Insurance for Committee members actions is an automatic insurance policy for most blocks.....

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online:
31 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

kiwipaul: 613

struggler: 459

Austman: 279

Billen Ben: 232

Millie: 201

considerate band fair: 167

Kangaroo: 167

Cosmo: 164

FlatChatFan: 147

daphne diaphanous: 137

Newest Members:

koshakosha

canberra45

Lisa Del Vecchio

blakpete

debbie6

Clayton6

gggs

neelthomas

Richie

Nordicnut1960

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 46

Topics: 4226

Posts: 19917

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 241

Members: 4821

Moderators: 4

Admins: 1

Administrators: JimmyT

Moderators: Whale, Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Lady Penelope