EC spending limits | Strata Committees | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
EC spending limits
Avatar
simone42
FlatChatter
Members
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
26/06/2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
26/06/2012 - 5:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Is there a state law or regulation that EC's need to follow re: spending limits.

At a recent AGM the EC set the limit at $3,000 before an EGM should be called to approve spending above this amount.

However, work has gone ahead for a $5000 quote for a project agreed as necessary at the AGM, but not yet quoted. I am now the worst person for pointing out that only the treasurer had approved the quote when EC should have - work has started and it is cold for people to come out to an EGM Frown 

Also, is there a separate approval process e.g. at least 3 members of a 9 member EC for the amount in between $1000 - $2000, anything like that. What usually happens in this gap.

The EC approved the secretary ( our strata managing agent ) can spend up to $1,000 as approved by the chairperson ( also the strata managing agent ).

If you could point me to the clause I would appreciate it as I feel the EC as a whole is responsible and accountable for spending by our agent.

Thanks

Avatar
struggler
NSW
StrataGuru
Members
Forum Posts: 459
Member Since:
02/11/2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
27/06/2012 - 7:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Same thing in my complex. EC has a limit of $4,000. Then I found an amount of $6,000 spent on I don't know what. Infact no one knows. And even if it was spent on a repair or maintenance we agreed to look at at a meeting, there was no amount that we agreed on or were made aware of.

Owners here just want to know what is spent on what. At AGM/EGM's our EC wants us to agree to works that haven't even been quoted on.

Avatar
mattb
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 75
Member Since:
09/10/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
27/06/2012 - 10:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The default amount is $12,500 which we left as is at our block.

Your amounts seem on the low and cautious side.

So far this year, we have had to spend the following: and in all honesty, having to call an AGM to spend money to repair a broken hot water boiler ($6K) and replacing the main automatic garage door while waiting on an insurance claim ($9K) would have put the building's residents at risk.

However, we have 5 on the EC and at least 3 have to agree to the quotes prior to spending and everything is in writing. There is an unwritten rule that the OC is involved from $10K up to $12.5K

In addition, the new WHS rules mean that a lot of items now need to be attended to fairly quickly and the additional steps involved in complying to the laws have added to the costs that a building will incur. By setting the dollar threshold so low, the OC could inadvertantly set itself up to be in a position of breaching laws....

Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4569
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
27/06/2012 - 11:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The Act is quite specific on all this - but only, it seems, in relation to 'large' strata schemes (schemes with 100 lot or more). There seem to be no spending limitations or rules on schemes with fewer lots in them (apart from when ir comes to taking legal action).

Assuming you are in a large scheme, firstly there's Section 75 (5)

An owners corporation of a large strata scheme must include in the estimates prepared under this section at an annual general meeting specific amounts in relation to each item or matter on which the owners corporation intends to expend money, or on which the owners corporation is aware money will be likely to be expended, in the period until the next annual general meeting.

Then there's this ...

80A   Limit on spending by executive committees of large strata schemes

(1)  If a specific amount has been determined as referred to in section 75 (5) for expenditure on any item or matter, the executive committee of the owners corporation concerned must not, in the period until the annual general meeting next occurring after the determination was made, spend on the item or matter an amount greater than that determined amount for expenditure on the item or matter plus 10 per cent.

(2)  The owners corporation of a large strata scheme may by resolution at a general meeting remove the limitation imposed by subsection (1) generally or in relation to any particular item or matter.

80B   Quotations to be obtained for certain items of expenditure by large strata schemes

An owners corporation of a large strata scheme must obtain at least 2 quotations in relation to proposed expenditure in respect of any one item or matter if the proposed expenditure will exceed an amount prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this section.

80C   Exceptions in relation to emergencies

Sections 80A (1) and 80B do not apply to expenditure undertaken for emergency purposes, including, for example, expenditure to remedy any of the following:

(a)  burst or blocked water or sewerage pipes,

(b)  serious damage caused by fire or by storm or any other natural disaster,

(c)  unexpected electrical or security system failure,

(d)  glass breakages that affect the security of any building in the strata scheme or could result in damage to the inside of any such building.

Hope this clarifies more than it confuses

Avatar
Sir Humphrey
Canberra
StrataGuru
Members

Full Members

Moderators
Forum Posts: 918
Member Since:
19/04/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
27/06/2012 - 10:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

That seems pretty reasonable. If it is urgent-someone could be seriously hurt and the OC liable-the EC can and should spend the money to fix the problem immediately. Even if someone won't get hurt but the OC is likely to be exposed to some other serious liability the EC should get on with fixing the problem and sort out who should have paid later. If it is not urgent, non-trivial amounts of unbudgeted spending should wait to go on an agenda for approval from a general meeting. 

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online:
22 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

kiwipaul: 613

struggler: 459

Austman: 305

Billen Ben: 232

Millie: 211

Kangaroo: 168

Cosmo: 167

considerate band fair: 167

FlatChatFan: 147

daphne diaphanous: 137

Newest Members:

strats all

ram298

napolilta

smallfry

Pears

firsttimer02

Susan H

brianjpxv

juliefig

prideaux

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 46

Topics: 4332

Posts: 20522

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 241

Members: 4926

Moderators: 4

Admins: 1

Administrators: JimmyT

Moderators: Whale, Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Lady Penelope