Miscreant Owner disrepecting Standing Orders | Strata Committees | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Miscreant Owner disrepecting Standing Orders
Avatar
kezza111
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 27
Member Since:
18/04/2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
16/08/2017 - 7:44 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

We held our AGM/SC meeting recently.

The Standing Orders was accepted by the majority of the owners as the first item.

An owner present (represented by a proxy) was asked to leave the room to recompose herself for 5 mins on a number of occasdions before being admitted back into the meeting room due to breaking the standing orders.

She was asked many times if she wanted to exercise her right to vote as the owner, which would have voided the proxy. She decline.

At no time did we banned her from the meeting. Only asking her to recompose herself outside of the meeting room before coming back in to observe.

Now she is threatening to take us to NCAT for denying her rights as an owner to be present during the whole meeting.

Some of the owners are fed up with her and want her banned from future meetings if she continues to have a proxy present.

Can we do this?

Can she threaten us? 

Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4496
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
16/08/2017 - 8:42 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

She can threaten all she wants - let her.  If she can't attend a meeting without bringing a proxy with her, and then can't conduct herself reasonably when she does attend, I don't fancy her chances at NCAT.

She doesn't have much of a case anyway.  She was invited to leave to compose herself before she got into further trouble - but even in the unlikely event that she could have run a case for being denied her right to be at the meeting she had her proxy there to make sure she didn't miss anything.  If both she and her proxy left, that was their decision.

Owners have the right to attend meetings but they don't have the right to constantly disrupt them to pursue their own agenda.

Perhaps next time you could have the Standing Orders adopted as a by-law then send her a Notice To Comply so that any further disruption can lead to her being fined.

You could raise the issue for mediation at Fair Trading with a view to seeking orders at NCAT (under  Section 232)  that this owner agrees not to disrupt meetings and to only send a proxy to vote on her behalf when she is not there to do so herself.  She will probably ignore the mediation but that's an obligatory first step. The penalties for breaching NCAT orders are pretty severe.

Avatar
Sir Humphrey
Canberra
StrataGuru
Members

Full Members

Moderators
Forum Posts: 909
Member Since:
19/04/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
16/08/2017 - 9:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I agree with Jimmy. The owner's argument is undermined by the fact that she appointed a proxy. The purpose of a proxy is to attend and act in your place. She appointed a proxy. So, it is self-evident that she has not been denied any rights. 

Avatar
kezza111
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 27
Member Since:
18/04/2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
17/08/2017 - 5:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thank you JT and Sir Humphrey.

Having been also named in the minutes as a miscreant owner did not deter her at all.

I will put forward a proposal to have the Standing Orders adopted as a By-Law at our next EGM in a few months time.

If this By-Law does not get approved, then I will go down the other path of mediation and then NCAT under Sect 232 as per JT's recommendation.

It has given me and the other owners hope of getting this situation back under control and put the focus back where it should be, on the management of our building.

Once again thank you for your invaluable advice.

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online: dingo
33 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

kiwipaul: 613

struggler: 459

Austman: 304

Billen Ben: 232

Millie: 203

Kangaroo: 168

considerate band fair: 167

Cosmo: 166

FlatChatFan: 147

daphne diaphanous: 137

Newest Members:

Tim349VicPl

Mariner

aylwardgame

reddant

danih

slicendice

Maun Warrior

Rayjen

Swaye1956

nitin964

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 46

Topics: 4279

Posts: 20222

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 241

Members: 4871

Moderators: 4

Admins: 1

Administrators: JimmyT

Moderators: Whale, Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Lady Penelope