Right to "view" proxies held by Chairman/Body Corp Manager at AGM | Strata Committees | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Right to "view" proxies held by Chairman/Body Corp Manager at AGM
Avatar
PrinzEugen
Newbie
Members
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
11/06/2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
11/06/2017 - 9:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

A 10 unit strata.  I was not at the last AGM but heard later that a motion to increase body Corp. Fees was passed with the aid of proxy votes held by the Chairman who is the external Body Corporate Manager.  The attendees at the meeting (& I also as a proxies providing absentee) did not want the fees increased.

Do I have a right to view the proxies or are they by their nature able to be used by the Chairman as they see fit anyway?

Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4443
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
12/06/2017 - 9:47 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Proxies have to be submitted in writing on the appropriate forms and as such form a record of the procedures in the strata scheme. You are legally entitled to view the records of your strata scheme, although there may be a small charge applied for doing so.

If there is any hesitation in providing the records, you should maybe start proceedings immediately (apply for mediation through Fair Trading) to have the AGM declared invalid as there is a time limit on any such challenges.

Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4443
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
13/06/2017 - 7:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Just thinking about this.  The chairman would have been allowed one proxy at the most and you have at least two votes of dissenting owners.  Unless there was a poll vote and his vote and his proxy vote totalled more unit entitlements than the objecting owners, the motion to increase fees would fail.  

Time you got yourself a new chairman and strata manager, I would say.

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online:
39 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

kiwipaul: 613

struggler: 459

Austman: 281

Billen Ben: 232

Millie: 201

considerate band fair: 167

Kangaroo: 167

Cosmo: 164

FlatChatFan: 147

daphne diaphanous: 137

Newest Members:

Isaac

Aussieethel

koshakosha

canberra45

Lisa Del Vecchio

blakpete

debbie6

Clayton6

gggs

neelthomas

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 46

Topics: 4226

Posts: 19927

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 241

Members: 4823

Moderators: 4

Admins: 1

Administrators: JimmyT

Moderators: Whale, Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Lady Penelope