Where's the security of tenure? | Forced sales - the 75 percent solution | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

These posts are now organised with the most recent post at the end. If you have already read the rest of the posts, to skip to the end, use the little bent arrow symbols to take you there. You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics.

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Where's the security of tenure?
Mailbox
Flat(chat)Mate
Members

Full Members
Forum Posts: 49
Member Since:
27/12/2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
17/02/2017 - 1:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
I’m prompted to raise this matter by a comment  made by John Symonds [Aussie Johns Home Loans] in a recent smh. He said that one of the reasons foreign buyers want to buy in Sydney is because land ownership is secure and lasts for “infinity” unlike other cities such as London where much of London is long term leasehold.
John Symonds was talking of a house but what happens to Apartments?
Say an apartment is built on land zoned for medium density, it’s on the north east corner,4 levels,8 large apts, close to transport.
It ticks all the boxes.
Suppose in 2050 due to population growth the land is rezoned for high rise development. Say 75% of owners want to sell and the rest want to remain. The building has been well maintained and is 30 years old. Where is the security of tenure in strata law?
2050 is just 30 years away or one generation. Is there any legislation to protect these owners?  Could provision made that an owner would move out during construction and move in to an apartment with a similar aspect on completion?
I have noticed that owners who sell to a developer never get sufficient to buy into the re development .
I hope the above notes will create interest and action. 
-RJW
Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4006
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
17/02/2017 - 2:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

RJW said

 

 Could provision made that an owner would move out during construction and move in to an apartment with a similar aspect on completion?

I have noticed that owners who sell to a developer never get sufficient to buy into the re development .
 

In fact there a is a lesser know provision of the Act that allows owners to add lots to their existing buildings, reconfigure the strata plan, redistribute the unit entitlements and sell the additional units to pay for work done.  It’s happened already in buildings where there is 100 per cent owner approval.  With the new laws, the majority of owners can agree to do this.  You’ll find an article I wrote about this here.

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online: JimmyT
34 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Sir Humphrey: 733

scotlandx: 627

kiwipaul: 613

struggler: 459

Austman: 246

Billen Ben: 232

Millie: 184

Kangaroo: 167

considerate band fair: 167

Cosmo: 151

Newest Members:

Stratavarious

Barry Morris

danielmcneil

vix

FischerPB0125

bham1

bham

peterg101

rob217194

Amy L

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 46

Topics: 3850

Posts: 18056

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 240

Members: 4422

Moderators: 2

Admins: 1

Administrators: JimmyT

Moderators: Whale, proudsceptic