Do I really need a by-law for my new bathroom? | By-laws and outlaws | Flat Chat Forum: Your Questions Answered




A A A

You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Do I really need a by-law for my new bathroom?
Avatar
mc
FlatChatter
Members
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
27/08/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
01/04/2018 - 7:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

So, let me try to get my brain around this…I want to renovate an existing ground floor unit bathroom. It will be, as most renovations are, complete with new tiling, bath/shower, vanity etc.

There is no strate bylaw and I’ve been told I have to pay $900 to create one to cover this Reno. Executive committee are adamant I can do nothing unless I pay to instate the bylaw.

its only a simple new bathroom, not a structurally complicated project. I intend to use licensed tradesmen.

So what’s the story? Why should I pay for a new bylaw to be created? I can’t believe I’m the only one who has had renovation plans in a 12 unit block.

Reading all the above posts, it seems the concern is for waterproofing. Is this the reason I need to request a new bylaw?

i thought this was going to be so straightforward! 

Avatar
scotlandx
StrataGuru
Members

Full Members

Moderators
Forum Posts: 803
Member Since:
02/02/2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
02/04/2018 - 4:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yes, it’s for the waterproofing, to make it clear the OC is not responsible for it.

Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4706
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
02/04/2018 - 5:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

It makes a lot of sense for your OC to create a one size fits all by-law for renovations like yours.  If they decline, tell them that you will make damned sure each of them pays full fare whenever they want to do work on their flats.  It’s time we stopped this rort (at worst) or laziness (at best) of demanding individual by-laws for identical work.

Avatar
mc
FlatChatter
Members
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
27/08/2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
04/04/2018 - 5:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

JimmyT said
It makes a lot of sense for your OC to create a one size fits all by-law for renovations like yours.  If they decline, tell them that you will make damned sure each of them pays full fare whenever they want to do work on their flats.  It’s time we stopped this rort (at worst) or laziness (at best) of demanding individual by-laws for identical work.  

Thanks Jimmy, that’s a good point……I’m off to suggest such a bylaw. It seems reasonable to go for “one size fits all” to save future owners angst. I am a reno virgin and was blissfully unaware of the pitfalls.

i want to say I accept all this is for the ultimate protection of the owners from Mr Shonky and his kin. It does seem to breed another group, Mr Greedy and his associated bag of money grabbers 

Avatar
goldy11
Newbie
Members
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
05/10/2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
04/04/2018 - 8:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Question? Should the generic by-law be added to the owner’s title?

Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4706
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
04/04/2018 - 11:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

goldy11 said
Question? Should the generic by-law be added to the owner’s title?  

All by-laws are part of your title anyway.  The generic by-law, used for a specific lot, would ascribe repair and maintenance of affected common property to that lot.  You wouldn’t need to link the by-law to the title as that is assumed.

Avatar
Mr Strata
FlatChatter
Members
Forum Posts: 19
Member Since:
24/07/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
10/04/2018 - 9:49 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

This all comes back to Part 6 of the Act and particularly Sections 106-111.

Division 1 of the Act

When the act was being changed, these new parts were added to simplify the requirements, but I would say it has created more confusion for many.

Further, it has been made apparent by many of the leading strata lawyers that a generic by-law is not suitable for this type of renovation and there should be specific by-laws for each lot, noting that you can not approve the renovation without a Special Resolution anyway.

The intent of this Section of the act is to address who has the ongoing responsibility for repair and maintenance of what would otherwise be considered to be common property.  Take for example the situation of the typical property flippers, who come in, renovate and sell, why should the OC and other owners in the building carry the cost of fixing the renovation shortcuts when the waterproofing fails, or the tiles over tiles starts to become an issue, even in some cases I have seen, creating concrete cancer in the bathroom flooring.

Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4706
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
10/04/2018 - 11:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Mr Strata said
… it has been made apparent by many of the leading strata lawyers that a generic by-law is not suitable for this type of renovation and there should be specific by-laws for each lot, noting that you can not approve the renovation without a Special Resolution anyway.

Yes, and yet “leading strata lawyers ” have written, re-written and amended generic by-laws for their client owners corps.

I think we have to differentiate between a by-law that tries to cover every possible eventuality and scenario (danger, danger!) and one that is a template for identical circumstances in largely identical apartments.

If all I need is a by-law thaqt protects the Owners Corp in case my tiler doesn’t waterproof the bathroom floor and walls properly, why do owners need to have the same provisions re-written at considerable cost every time this comes up?

If all you are changing is the lot number on the by-law, I don’t see how this requires the work of a strata lawyer and a strata manager (who may have  never set foot in the building) to check if this is appropriate.

Good flexible by-laws that place responsibility where it belongs are essential.  And in circumstances where the lot owner is going way past the parameters outlined in the by-law, you would start drafting a new one.

But paying lawyers hundreds of dollars to Tippex out one lot number, write in another and then photocopy it, is as close to a rort as I can imagine.

Having said that, I’m sure some “leading strata lawyers” would vehemently disagree. But would they refuse the gig on principle if you asked them to write a template by-law?

I rest my case …

Avatar
Mr Strata
FlatChatter
Members
Forum Posts: 19
Member Since:
24/07/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
10/04/2018 - 1:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Jimmy,

some of us that think pragmatically about these matters would suggest that there is a real simple answer to this…. a By-law gets passed and registered for the first renovation of this nature, and is simply amended to add the next lot number as and when they wish to renovate in this manner.  This is ok as long as the works are the same, no alterations of plans etc

The question is then one of who pays what costs for the drafting and registration of the By-law.

Some would argue those benefiting should pay all costs, while others may consider that the By-law is equally for the protection of the OC, but best for the parties involved to come to some form of agreement on this.

Avatar
JimmyT
Admin
Forum Posts: 4706
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
10/04/2018 - 3:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

True.  But the first person to want to renovate their bathroom is unlikely to be the last (far from it).  And I’d say, as a rule of thumb, if your building is older than 10 years, you should be thinking about this kind of by-law, if you don’t already have one.

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online:
21 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

kiwipaul: 584

struggler: 458

Austman: 323

Billen Ben: 205

Millie: 202

Cosmo: 182

considerate band fair: 160

FlatChatFan: 140

Kangaroo: 140

daphne diaphanous: 136

Newest Members:

mehulkhot

TinMan

Shivraj Jadhav

RoseLane

ankurajha

Trmcb

Abhjit

Erte

Flem1ngton

BarbCS

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 40

Topics: 4520

Posts: 21692

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 242

Members: 5276

Moderators: 5

Admins: 1

Administrators: JimmyT

Moderators: Whale, Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Lady Penelope, Stratabox.com.au