A A A

You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Major Renovations Commenced Prior to Appropriate Council/Compliance Approvals
Avatar
Imogen Bannister
FlatChatter
Members
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
16/03/2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
14/03/2018 - 11:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Twelve months after a rogue renovator started major alterations, removal of walls and re-configuring of the floor plan without any approvals whatsoever, we eventually approved the By-Laws subject to appropriate Council/Compliance approvals prior. Work recommenced very shortly after the EGM but six months down the track we still have not seen any notification from Council or any Private Certifier.

Can this By-Law be considered null and void? Please advise what “status” the by-law can now be considered. 

Many thanks!

Avatar
Jimmy-T
Admin
Forum Posts: 5212
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
14/03/2018 - 12:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The by-law isn’t “null and void” but it may have been breached.  Did it say that the commencement or resumption of work was contingent on council approvals? Or just that approval of the work was dependent on council DAs?  If the latter, the rogue renovator could argue that all he or she was seeking was approval after the work had been done.

Any work that involves the reconfiguration of the rooms in an apartment requires council approval.  My next call would be to the council’s planning department asking them to investigate.  They can issue a ‘stop work’ notice if need be.

Failing that, you could apply directly to NCAT (no need to go to Fair Trading on this) for an interim order that all work cease until appropriate approvals have been granted. Go to this page to find the links to the necessary forms.  You apply for an interim order under Section 231 of the Act.

If the rogue developer is smart, they will get the builder to say this is a complying development – which means no council involvement.  Don’t fall for it and if they try it on, tell the builder you will report them (not the owner) to Fair Trading for fraudulent behaviour.

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online:
29 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Whale: 1584

kiwipaul: 584

struggler: 458

Austman: 344

Millie: 213

Billen Ben: 205

Cosmo: 197

considerate band fair: 160

Boronia: 144

FlatChatFan: 140

Newest Members:

faeze1

faeze

mandbwalker@bigpond.com

HABD

darshika.dwivedi

cfclarke

SharonB

Kesa

JD Thomson

hanbug

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 40

Topics: 5011

Posts: 23677

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 243

Members: 5715

Moderators: 6

Admins: 1

Administrators: Jimmy-T

Moderators: Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Christopher Jones, Lady Penelope, Stratabox.com.au, Jimmy-T