A A A

You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.

Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Common property with access only to certain lots
Avatar
JohnKen
Newbie
Members
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
04/08/2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
04/08/2018 - 5:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi,

Our Sydney Strata has a significant number of planter boxes that are common property but can only be accessed through particular lots.  That is to say certain lots have the only access to a common property planter.

Some of these areas are maintained by a gardener at Strata expense, in the main these areas just happen to be attached to SC members lots.  Other areas are not maintained by the gardener.

Other lot owners have no access to any of these planter boxes.

This issue is now more problematic as the planter boxes have been relined and the Strata is about to pay a significant amount to replant some.

Is it reasonable to expect that these planter boxes be replanted at each lot owners expense.  The relining was required to remedy water egress.

Could these planter boxes be added to the adjoining lots?

Avatar
g-g
Flat(chat)Mate
Members
Forum Posts: 100
Member Since:
20/03/2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
05/08/2018 - 12:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

JohnKen – if the planter boxes are common property, as you have said, then an individual lot owner is not responsible for their maintenance – despite how the common property is accessed.

To pass responsibility of the planter boxes (common property) to a lot owner would require their consent and an exclusive use by-law – at the least. 

In my view, it is not ‘reasonable’ to try to pass the cost to an individual lot owner.

Avatar
Jimmy-T
Admin
Forum Posts: 5213
Member Since:
06/01/2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
07/08/2018 - 2:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

JohnKen said
Is it reasonable to expect that these planter boxes be replanted at each lot owners expense?  

Absolutely.  Even if this was a garden which was part of the lot, the owners would be expected to maintain it at their own expense in a manner that was in keeping with the appearance of the building.

The planters are different from the plants that they contain.  The Owners Corp might be responsible for maintaining a common property parking spot, but they don’t have to pay to service the car that’s parked there. 

Sounds like these owners have been getting a free ride on the gardening front.

And, despite what Puddn said above, unless there is a by-law or section of the strata plan that says the plants in the planters will be maintained at the OC’s expense, the costs of the gardening should be sheeted back to the plant owners.

Forum Timezone: Australia/Sydney

Most Users Ever Online: 518

Currently Online:
23 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Whale: 1584

kiwipaul: 584

struggler: 458

Austman: 344

Millie: 213

Billen Ben: 205

Cosmo: 197

considerate band fair: 160

Boronia: 144

Kangaroo: 140

Newest Members:

taurus

thdhill

daisy

SolutionsIE

WY

katanakid

faeze1

faeze

mandbwalker@bigpond.com

HABD

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 40

Topics: 5013

Posts: 23684

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 243

Members: 5721

Moderators: 6

Admins: 1

Administrators: Jimmy-T

Moderators: Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Christopher Jones, Lady Penelope, Stratabox.com.au, Jimmy-T