You must be registered and logged in to reply to posts or post new topics. Click on "How to Use This Forum" for simple instructions on how to get on board. NB: Please do not use your real name or email address as your screen name - if you do it will be changed to something less insecure.
The TWO sewer lines from our building to the main sewer trunk is becoming more and more compromised by the roots from a large fig tree on the neighbouring property. We have been advised by the plumber that the clay pipes need to be replaced with PVC to eliminate the problem. This is a costly job as the parking area will have to be carved up to do it.
My question is… who is financially responsible for this repair?
The tree is very large and quite old so it could have been there when the blocks were built in the 1960s. We have been advised to approach council about the problem. Does the council have responsibility/ liability for big trees inside a property boundary? Does the neighbouring OC have any liability?
I suspect it would be prudent for us to approach the neighbouring OC directly (that’s my current plan) That way we can approach council with a united front (fingers crossed) if appropriate.
Anyone got an opinion??
danih – The neighbouring property is definitely responsible for the damage caused by the roots of their tree.
Are there any other large trees that are in the vicinity that could also be adding to your problem? Your neighbour will look to avoid the responsibility of the root damage as much as possible and will likely blame other trees – so be prepared.
To fully prepare for any future action you will need to obtain some more information ……
1. Ask the plumber to provide a written report about the damage caused to your pipes from the neighbouring tree.
2. Take photos of the tree.
3. Obtain a screen shot copy of a Google map satellite image of your property and its immediate surrounds which show the fig tree.
4. Obtain a quote (preferably two quotes) for the costs of all of the works involved e.g. trenching, replacement of the pipe, back filling and replacing the car park surface.
The steps to be taken after you have obtained those pieces of information are outlined in the link below:
And in The Trees Act is linked here:
Lady P… thank you so much!! You are a legend!!
I can and will do all of that.
I’ve just been out to photograph the tree and have discovered it seems to straddle two seperate properties – it’s at the apex of 2 blocks that come to an apex.
I’ll read through the links you posted. Looks like it could get complicated!!
I can’t help you work out who should pay, but I can recommend a product called RootX. This kills the roots in the sewer line (and rather inexpensive). It probably won’t be a long term solution but may keep your sewer running until you can sort out who is responsible for repairs/replacement. I have a unit in an older complex with clay pipes. The RootX fixes most sewer issues we have.
Recently, my sewer line was backing up because the roots of the Rhus tree on on the footpath outside my house had penetrated the sewer pipe. Council wanted the tree to remain.
So the solution we adopted was to have a specialist drainer cut away the roots and install a plastic pipe within the old clay pipes. It was not cheap – $11,000, but it solved the problem. It was cheaper than removing the old pipes and installing new ones. The sewer no longer backs up and the tree continues to flourish.
My suggestion is to obtain a quotation, and ask the OC next door to go halves.
Lady Penelope is very definitive in #2 above:
The neighbouring property is definitely responsible for the damage caused by the roots of their tree.
I don’t understand. Trees have been sending roots out for millions of years. Humans have been using clay pipes with shonky cement joints for a couple of hundred years. Nowadays we know that pores or small cracks in the cement pass moisture, attracting nearby roots which penetrate the cracks, enlarge the cracks, and then grow inside the pipe. So now we use PVC pipes joined with water-repellant adhesive which don’t leak at all. Roots simply don’t know the PVC pipe has water in it and go somewhere else.
So whose fault is the blockage?
So whose fault is the blockage?
There’s a difference between fault and responsibility. You are responsible for everything you own.
It might not be your fault if your parked car’s brakes fail and it rolls into the back of someones Porsche, but you’ll find you are responsible when it comes to an insurance claim.
Hello clever people…
So we’ve heard back from one of the two strata committees involved in the above issue. They say they’re not responsible for our costs because they didn’t know about the problem and, now that they do, they’re investigating cutting down the tree (sad – Personally, I would like them to investigate the possibility of a root barrier rather than wholesale removal… even though the tree drops tons of leaves and seeds into our parking area. It’s a nice tree!!).
I have informed them politely that ignorant is not a defence.
We haven’t heard anything from the other strata scheme, which appears to be self managed (their strata mailbox was overflowing…)
My questions are:
1) can one strata plan unilaterally remove a tree that goes over two property boundaries?
2) As most of the units in these blocks are rented out, what rights do the tenants have with regard to removal of the tree?
Most Users Ever Online: 518
Currently Online: Ethicsfirst
Currently Browsing this Page:
Billen Ben: 205
considerate band fair: 160
Guest Posters: 243
Moderators: Sir Humphrey, scotlandx, Christopher Jones, Lady Penelope, Stratabox.com.au, Jimmy-T