• This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by .
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #55188
    snazzy granny
    Flatchatter

      An owner nominated herself to be on the committee at an AGM.   She then stormed out over a disagreement before voting for the committee officers [ie treasurer, secretary etc] took place.  She is now saying she is on the committee. (although not an office bearer).  Is this correct?

      My question is – do you have to be voted on to a committee or is merely nominating yourself sufficient. Thanks

    Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #55209
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        My question is – do you have to be voted on to a committee or is merely nominating yourself sufficient.

        Nominating yourself is enough unless there are fewer seats than there are nominations, in which case you hold a ballot.

        She could have nominated before the meeting, so she doesn’t have to be there for the vote, provided she did so in writing.

        The only other complication might be if she is a joint owner of her flat, in which case she can’t self-nominate.

        The correct procedure is:

        1. for the chair to announce the pre-meeting nominations (which must be in writing)

        2. Call for nominations from the floor

        3. take a vote on how many seats the owners want on the committee (between 1 and 9)

        4. Organise a vote if there are more nominations than seats.

        By the way, voting must be done by giving everyone a blank sheet of paper on which they should write the names of their preferred nominated candidates, up to a possible maximum of the number of seats available (but they don’t have to fill in the same number of names as there are seats).

        If you followed the above procedure to the letter of the Regulations (Part 2, sections 9 and 10) you could argue that she wasn’t there when oral nominations were called for as part of the precribed procedure.

        But if you strayed from the correct processes, you could find the whole election process challenged and you might have to hold another general meeting and start again.

        The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
      Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.