This topic contains 4 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Jimmy-T 4 months, 2 weeks ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #12116

    During the recent hailstorm in Sydney one of the two storey townhouses in our complex suffered damage to a skylight.

     A generic by-law for the installation of skylights exists which states “… the Owners Corporation confers on the Owners the exclusive use and enjoyment of those parts of the common property the demolition removal or replacement of which is comprised in the work which will become common property subject to the following conditions.”  Then there are a number of clauses relating to position, workmanship etc and “the Owners shall be responsible for the maintenance, upkeep and – whenever necessary – renewal or replacement of those parts of the common property the subject of this by-law.

    The owner sought to claim on the Strata insurance policy but the SC referred him to the wording of the by-law (that he was responsible for replacement) and that he should claim on his insurance policy.

    The owner contacted his insurance company (contents insurance) and was told his policy did not cover building items as these were covered under the Strata insurance.  It appears that an owner cannot have an insurable interest in any item which forms part of the common property.

    Please discuss.

    #30979
    Avatar
    VicRes
    Flatchatter

    I believe that I’ve read here previously that any owner can directly submit a claim on the OC Insurance without going through the committee.

     

    Therefore, the owner should submit the claim and I suggest pay the excess noting that the skylight is their responsibility.

    #30983
    Avatar
    Austman
    Flatchatter

    I agree with VicRes.  

    Even if responsible for its maintenance, it’s doubtful that a lot owner could insure the skylight even if they wanted to.

    Compulsory strata insurance covers buildings regardless of if parts of them are common property or lot property or if they are a lot maintenance responsibility or not.  It also usually covers lot fixtures, fittings and improvements.

    Who pays the excess is another matter.

    #30996

    So if the cost to repair/replace the skylight is less than the Strata insurance excess, the owner should be required to pay?

    #31001
    Jimmy-T
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

    @paddy said:
    So if the cost to repair/replace the skylight is less than the Strata insurance excess, the owner should be required to pay?  

    It depends on the specific wording of the by-law that allowed the skylight to be installed in the first place.  But if it passes the cost of repairs etc to the lot owner, then, yes, the lot owner should pay the balance.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login Register